Also visit:
The Wahabies/Salafies are the evil ones according to Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.
9 Hadiths exposing this evil cult. Prophet Muhammad even called them "The Horn of Satan".
Rebuttal to Jalal Abualrub's (the dajjal) "If you love Allah, then follow Muhammad" article:
The following is my detailed refutation to the foul-mouthed salafi and dajjal (liar and rubbish talker in Arabic) Jalal Abualrub. His article is located at: http://www.islamlife.com/downloads.php?cat_id=4&download_id=14.
He wrote:
If You Love Allah, Then Follow Muhammad By Jalal Abualrub (WWW.IslamLife.Com)
{Say (O, Muhammad): “If you love Allâh, then follow me, Allâh will love you and forgive you your sins. And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful”}; [3:31].
The Method of Defending Islam by Corrupting its Texts We live in troubled times. Muslims are divided and weak, and their division and weakness are but symptoms of the larger ills that plague many among them: lack of sufficient knowledge in Islam and a weak desire to learn and abide by its creed and law. This is especially the case among the Muslims who live in the West, except that there is good news even here. Throughout the Muslim World, and also in the West, there are numerous Muslims who strive hard to seek knowledge in Islam and to practice as much of it as they possibly can. And because Allah, the Quran, the Prophetic Sunnah, Islam and Muslims have come under continuous onslaught by the enemies of Islam, many Muslims also strive hard to respond to these attacks with knowledge and evidence, having full faith in Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and believing in everything he came with from Allah. Consequently, a number of Islamic websites were started in recent years to explain Islam and defend its sacred tenets and values without corruption or personal interpretation. However, a number of ‘Islamic’ websites were also started to propagate personal interpretations on the Quran and Sunnah, regardless of what the Quran and Sunnah state, and to spread old extremism and sectarian ideas under new slogans. The danger posed in these so-called ‘Islamic’ websites is that they propagate an Islam that is totally or partially different from the Islam brought from Allah and practiced by Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, Allah’s Final and Last Prophet and Messenger, and conveyed to mankind by his honorable companions.
My response:
Nothing to refute here.
He wrote:
The danger becomes greater if the Muslim youth become an enthusiastic audience to this type of deviancy so much so that they will passionately justify their support of these sites and those behind them by saying that the deviancy is excusable since these sites defend Islam against Evangelicals and Jews, so they claim. However, this is an emotional stance taken at the expense of Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and the honor of his companions, may Allah be pleased with them. By taking this stance, these Muslims, who declare Muhammad to be their Prophet, associate with and support those who declare that Prophet Muhammad made errors in explaining the Quran, that he was not sent to explain the Quran and that his companions lied or erred in the Hadeeths they reported from him.
My response:
Here the foul-mouthed salafi is referring to me, despite the fact that I have repented several times in the past and he knows that very well! The following articles thoroughly expose him:
(Note: Be warned that foul insults in Arabic from him exist in the first link)
|
Jalal
Abualrub went crazy! See his FOUL LANGUAGE and fatwa (verdict)
for me to be killed! |
Emails
from Salafies who despise Jalal Abualrub.
Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace and which do I condemn?
Sex with animals: Are Jalal Abualrub and Nadir Ahmed (N/A) really mentally stable persons? See how Nadir Ahmed falsely and unjustly propagates that Islam allows sex with animals on his irrelevant web site, and how Jalal Abualrub (the dajjal) keeps promoting NA's site on his web site despite the fact that he knows about this article and the Truth about Nadir.
Jalal Abualrub's scholarly advise to Nadir Ahmed to VIDEO TAPE his fight with me!
He wrote:
Most Muslims will be outraged at Christians and Jews if they utter such deviant ideas. Sadly, some Muslims see no problem in this type of ideas as long as these websites keep engaging Evangelicals, even if the price is to discredit Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and those who transferred both the Quran and Sunnah from him. After all, what is the aim of hostile Evangelicals and Jews other than discrediting Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, seeking to destroy the Islamic Message by destroying the credibility of the Messenger of Islam? They know that indeed, discrediting Muhammadʹs integrity is a total destruction of the Message of Islam. How can any Muslim think that he or she can call non-Muslims to the Quran if, according to these misguided Muslims, Allah sent down the Quran to a man who contradicted the Quran and said ‘utter nonsense’? Sadly, again, there are some Muslims who presently propagate these ideas which bring joy to the same Evangelicals whom these people claim to be engaging in defense of Islam. Every hostile enemy of Islam would love to discredit Muhammad, peace be upon him, knowing very well that this will inevitably discredit the Quran. They would love it even more if some Muslims do the job for them by falsely claiming that Allah did not protect His Prophet’s Sunnah and that Muhammad, peace be upon him, did not have the right to explain the Quran and made errors in the Message. Islam’s enemies might then ask this question of the so-called ‘defenders of Islam’ who propagate such ideas, “If Muhammad made errors in the Message, then, what guarantees do we have that he did not also err in conveying the letter of the Quran itself by inserting his own words in its text including adding this Ayah, {Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr and surely, We will guard it (from corruption)}; [15:9]?”
The fact is that the ‘Muslims’ who claim to defend Islam, yet, discredit the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, are deviants who seek to insert their own understanding of the Quran according to their wishes and desires. This is why it is essential for them to discredit Muhammadʹs Sunnah and reject his Hadeeths that seem to interfere with their plan, by claiming to only abide by the Hadeeths that do not contradict the Quran, meaning, the meaning of the Quran according to them. They use their opinion as the guide with which to explain the Quran, and therefore, any Hadeeth that contradicts their opinion must be rejected. The method they use to ‘defend Islam’ concentrates on ridiculing its Prophet and corrupting Islamic Texts in defiance of the Quran that ordains on Muslims complete obedience to the Sunnah. They seek to defend Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, by rejecting his statements and practices using various devious methods, such as confusing the authentic Hadeeths with false Hadeeths, rejecting the former because the latter contains falsehood. They want Muslims to abandon the Prophet’s explanation on his own Quran and instead adopt their deranged explanation on it. It is truly astounding to claim to defend Muhammad’s Quran, yet, reject his role as the receiver of the interpretation of the Quran, as well as, the letter of the Quran itself. To this type of ‘Muslim’, Prophet Muhammad could have easily been replaced by a tape recorder since his only role as a Prophet was to convey the words of the Quran, as they falsely claim. This, indeed, is a rejection of the Message of Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, regardless of what these people claim to be doing against hostile Evangelicals, who also invent false meanings for the Quran and stubbornly reject Muhammadʹs explanation on it. True Muslims never sympathize with the enemies of Muhammad, peace be upon him, whether they are Christians, Jews or ‘Muslims’. What you will read in this article will astonish you to the extent of wondering how some Muslims dare write for these websites, let alone support the ideas and beliefs contained in them. This is an article that heavily relies on the Quran in support of Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and in defense of his honor and the honor of his companions, may Allah be pleased with them. It is our gift to all those who love Allah and who know that the only way to be loved by Allah is to follow Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and indeed, {He who obeys the Messenger (Muhammad),has indeed obeyed Allâh}; [4:80]. In this article, there is a powerful insight into the Quran’s description of Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, and his role in Islam. We believe in Allah and obediently follow Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, {Allâh has decreed: “Verily, it is I and My Messengers who shall be the victorious.” Verily, Allâh is All-Powerful, All-Mighty}; [58:21].
My response:
To the reader, I have thoroughly covered which Islamic beliefs do I embrace and which do I condemn at:
Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace and which do I condemn?
I am not a rejector of the Hadiths and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. I only reject the doubtful hadiths. This liar is making baseless claims that hold no Truth.
He wrote:
Osama Abdallah’s WWW.Answering-Christianity.Com
Corrupts Islam and Belittles Its Prophet
Here is a collection of outrageous, incoherent remarks made by Osama Abdallah against Islam and filled with different types of error with regards to the Islamic Faith as stated in the Quran and Sunnah and accepted by the majority of Muslims throughout Islam’s history. It was not easy to arrange these remarks against topic due to the enormous error contained in them and the erratic and incoherent nature of Osama’s writings. In this article entitled, ‘If You Love Allah, Then Follow Muhammad’, I will mention what Osama Abdallah said (in red) in sections arranged according to topic, if possible that is, then respond to each section (in black) with evidence and proof. Links to Osama’s articles are listed at the end of this article, including articles I did not directly mention here and articles he quietly removed from the main page but did not publicly disown. There is no doubt that Osama Abdallah does not represent Islam, but an alien, deviant methodology of his own creation. And for those who expressed outrage at me for defending the Sunnah against its enemy, they should instead feel outrage at this man explaining the Arabic Quran according to his whims and desires, even though he admits that ‘Unfortunately, I am not an expert in Arabic, nor can I explain in deep details about proper Arabic.’ They should firmly reject Osama’s clear rejection of the Prophetic Sunnah, which he calls ‘garbage’, and his ridicule of its scholars by using foul words and ill description.
Only recently I became aware of the full extent of Osama’s creed and the deviant ideas he propagates. Before, I had decided to ignore Osama since, as the old Arab saying goes, the best medicine for the ignorant is to ignore him. But, when I came to realize the full extent of his deviancy and was told –both by him and by others- that his website is popular with many Muslim youth, ignoring him became no longer an option. Thus, this article seeks to explain Islam and defend its Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, his companions and the rest of the Salaf as-Slai`h whom Allah raised to bring Islam to the world and preserve it for all of mankind until the Day of Judgment. I ask Allah to make this effort sincere in His Sake and in obedience to His Prophet, {And whoso obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad), then they will be in the company of those on whom Allâh has bestowed His Grace of the Prophets, the Siddiqűn (followers of the Prophets who were first and foremost to believe in them, like Abu Bakr As-Siddîq), the martyrs, and the righteous. And how excellent these companions are!}; [4:69].
My response:
Again, to the reader, please visit: Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace and which do I condemn?
He wrote:
The Quran, We Like; It’s Muhammad We’re Not So Sure About!
Note: Osama’s statements are in red; Jalal Abualrub’s response is in black: I personally think that the Prophet did misinterpret some Noble Verses…the Prophet…did make the mistake of interpreting some Noble Verses that were not really revealed for him to explain.…Believe it or not, many of the interpretations that you see about the Noble Quran are WRONG, even by our Prophet peace be upon him himself… If there is complimenting evidence that exists outside the Noble Quran in other Books that have other Prophetsʹ quotes such as Jesus or Moses…then we should study them and see if they would change the interpretation of the Noble Quran…Prophet Muhammad…only came to give the Message of the Noble Quran to Mankind. Certainly, not every Noble Verse that was revealed to him was really revealed for him; meaning, not every Noble Verse was meant for him to interpret. He certainly messed up on some of them…the Hadiths of today contain utter nonsense! I donʹt know if these Hadiths were narrated by the Prophet. The Hadith…in the beginning of this post suggests that the Prophet did indeed say it. If this is the case, then the Prophet had spoken utter nonsense when he thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt. This is the problem when one wants to think that he is being inspired when he/she has *good* inner feelings...This is a mistake our Prophet had fell into.
This is not what Evangelicals say about Prophet Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam. This is not what Jews say about Prophet Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam. This is what Osama Abdallah ‘personally’ says about Prophet Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam. The readers should carefully analyze Osama’s statements here and judge the type of Islam he propagates. As for Osama’s supporters, they should reexamine their faith and remember the meeting with Allah on the Day of Judgment when He will ask them about the response they gave to His Prophet, {And (remember) the Day (Allâh) will call to them, and say: “What answer gave you to the Messengers?”}; [28:65].
It seems that here, Osama accuses the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, of lying on Allah. Just read what Osama said, ‘…the Prophet had spoken utter nonsense when he thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt. This is the problem when one wants to think that he is being inspired when he/she has *good* inner feelings’ and compare it to what Allah said, {And who can be more unjust than he who invents a lie against Allâh, or says: “A revelation has come to me” whereas no Revelation has come to him}; [6:93].
Inshaallah, and throughout this article, I will elaborate on this evil statement that Osama made about Allah’s Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam. I chose to mention this statement first because it summarizes the deviant creed that Osama has in Islam. I should also add that Osama plays the same game that Evangelicals play: he moves or removes articles where he is caught making errors or rejecting Hadeeth, but does not repent publicly form his ideas or admit to the error. Whether he removes these articles or not, the true indication that he repented can be demonstrated through his public rejection of these ideas and in denouncing them in clear terms. Simply, Osama Abdallah made decisions on Allah’s behalf. How do Osama’s decisions compare to what Allah has decided in the Quran? Osama said: The Prophet…did make the mistake of interpreting some Noble Verses that were not really revealed for him to explain; Prophet Muhammad…only came to give the Message of the Noble Quran to Mankind…not every Noble Verse was meant for him to interpret; the Prophet had spoken utter nonsense when he thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt. This is the problem when one wants to think that he is being inspired when he/she has *good* inner feelings...This is a mistake our Prophet had fell into. Allah declares in the Quran that, {Wa-ma yantiqu `anil-hawa, in huwa illa wa`hyun yu`ha (He [Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam] does not speak of his own desire, it is only a revelation revealed)}; [53:3-4]. The Quran declares that the Quran was not the only Revelation that came down from Allah to Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam, {Move not your tongue concerning (the Qur’ân, O, Muhammad) to make haste therewith. It is for Us to collect it (in your heart, O, Muhammad) and to give you (O, Muhammad) its Quran (the ability to recite the Quran). And when We have recited it to you (O, Muhammad through Angel Jibrîl), then follow its Quran (the Qur’ân’s recitation). Then it is for Us (Allâh) to give its Bayan (its explanation, meaning, interpretation, implication, and so forth [and refer to: Tu`hfat al-A`hwadhi & Fat`h-ul Bari])}; [75:16-19]. In the Quran, Allah explains why He made a promise to teach Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, the Quran in addition to its Bayan, by stating that: {And We have also sent down unto you (O, Muhammad) the Dhikr (the Qur’ân), that YOU may Tubayyina (give the Bayan, or explain clearly) to men what is sent down to them}; [16:44]. In the Quran, Allah made referring to the Prophet’s judgment in every dispute or difference that arises between Muslims the sign that distinguishes faith, by saying, {But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O, Muhammad) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission}; [4:65].
Conclusion: Osama’s decision: The Prophet…did make the mistake of interpreting some Noble Verses that were not really revealed for him to explain; Allah’s Decision: And We have also sent down unto you (O, Muhammad) the Dhikr (the Qur’ân), that you may Tubayyina (give the Bayan, or explain clearly) to men what is sent down to them. Osama’s decision: Prophet Muhammad…only came to give the Message of the Noble Quran to Mankind…not every Noble Verse was meant for him to interpret; Allah’s Decision: And We have also sent down unto you (O, Muhammad) the Dhikr (the Qur’ân), that you may Tubayyina (give the Bayan, or explain clearly) to men what is sent down to them. Osama’s decision: The Prophet had spoken utter nonsense when he thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt…This is the problem when one wants to think that he is being inspired when he/she has *good* inner feelings...This is a mistake our Prophet had fell into; Allah’s Decision: Wa-ma yantiqu `anil-hawa, in huwa illa wa`hyun yu`ha (He [Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam] does not speak of his own desire, it is only a revelation revealed). Osama’s decision: The Prophet…did make the mistake of interpreting some Noble Verses that were not really revealed for him to explain; Allah’s Decision: But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O, Muhammad) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission. The type of respect Osama has for Allah’s Prophet: If Muhammad himself is nothing; a nobody; a piece of (not even a) bacteria when compared to GOD Almighty according to the Noble Quran; the type of respect Allah ordained on Muslims towards His Prophet: {O, you who believe! Make not (a decision) in advance before Allâh and His Messenger, and fear Allâh. Verily, Allâh is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. O, you who believe! Raise not your voices above the voice of the Prophet, nor speak aloud to him in talk as you speak aloud to one another, lest your deeds should be rendered fruitless while you perceive not}; [49:1-2]. Osama’s decision: Prophet Muhammad…only came to give the Message of the Noble Quran to Mankind…not every Noble Verse was meant for him to interpret, adding that, if there is complimenting evidence that exists outside the Noble Quran in other Books that have other Prophetsʹ quotes such as Jesus or Moses…then we should study them and see if they would change the interpretation of the Noble Quran. [Osama rejects Prophet Muhammadʹs role as the interpreter of the meaning contained in the Quran, even though this Quran was revealed to him, and instead wants to adopt the meaning of the Quran found in statements attributed to Prophets Jesus and Moses, to whom this Quran was not revealed]; Allah’s Decision: {Surely, We have sent down to YOU (O, Muhammad) the Book (Qur’ân) in truth that you might judge between men by that which Allâh has shown you (has taught you through Divine Revelation [such as the Bayan of the Quran, the Sunnah])}; [4:105]; Allah’s Decision as stated in Muhammadʹs words: “If Musa were to be alive today, he will have no option but to follow me”; [A`hmad (14104); Bidayat as-Sul (5)].
My response:
All of this will continue to be repeated below by the desperate foul-mouthed salafi. However, before we get into his old news, which he purposely lied about and turned them into current breaking news, it is important to know that the Dhikr that Allah Almighty sent down to Prophet Muhammad was the Noble Quran and nothing else! Two Dhikrs were sent down: One to Prophet Moses, peace be upon him, and the other to Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.
The Hadiths of the Prophet, peace be upon him, are not Divine Quran; they are not Thikr. They are certainly inspirations from the Angels, but Angels' inspirations come upon everyone:
"Raised high above ranks (or degrees), (He is) the Lord
of the Throne (of Authority): by His Command doth He send the Spirit
(of inspiration) to any of His servants he pleases, that it may
warn (men) of the Day of Mutual Meeting,- (The
Noble Quran, 40:15)"
Challenge: Show us one Hadith that says that the Prophet's Sayings (Hadiths) are Thikr (Dhikr).
From http://www.answering-christianity.com/are_salafies_real.htm:
The lie of Dhikr and false qurans:
I have covered this topic in great details in the following article:
But basically in a nutshell, there is a lie that was invented against Allah Almighty, which I call it the "lie of Dhikr (Thikr)". Allah Almighty Said the following Noble Verse:
"We have, without doubt, sent down the Message (Dhikr); and We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption). (The Noble Quran, 15:9)"
What this Noble Verse is referring to is the Noble Quran, because Allah Almighty only Sent down two Dhikrs:
For more details and proofs, please visit: Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt! Also, what does the Noble Quran say about the Bible's Law!
| Noble Verse(s) 68:51 |
| Yusuf
Ali: [068:051] And the Unbelievers would almost trip thee up with their eyes when they hear the Message (Thikr); and they say: "Surely he is possessed!" Arabic (from right to left): 68:51 وان يكاد الذين كفروا ليزلقونك بابصارهم لما سمعوا الذكر ويقولون انه لمجنون |
Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, became a Prophet at the age of 40. Prior to his Prophethood and afterwards, the people were never blown away by his personal words. He was just an ordinary person whom people respected so much for his integrity and honesty that they used to title him, before he became a Prophet, as "Al-Sadeq Al-Ameen" - the truthful/honest, the trustworthy. They never thought he was crazy when he spoke to any of them! Yet, Allah Almighty Said in Noble Verse 68:51 above that when the infidels heard the Prophet recite the Thikr/Dhikr they declared him to be a mad man. There is no question that the Thikr is none other than the Noble Quran in the Noble Verse, because the Noble Quran is not the Prophet's personal words!
Furthermore, Allah Almighty also Said:
| Noble Verse(s) 16:43-16:44 |
| Arberry: [016:043] We sent not any before thee, except men to whom We revealed: 'Question the people of the Remembrance (Thikr), if it should be that you do not know -- [016:044] with the clear signs, and the Psalms; and We have sent down to thee the Remembrance (Thikr) that thou mayest make clear to mankind what was sent down to them; and so haply they will reflect.Arabic (from right to left): 16:43 وماارسلنا من قبلك الا رجالا نوحي اليهم فسألوا اهل الذكر ان كنتم لاتعلمون16:44 بالبينات والزبر وانزلنا اليك الذكر لتبين للناس مانزل اليهم ولعلهم يتفكرون |
These Noble Verses are often misinterpreted and misused by the blasphemous salafies, because they claim that the Thikr that Allah Almighty sent down to Prophet Muhammad are the Hadiths because the last part of Noble Verse 16:44 says: "....that thou mayest make clear to mankind what was sent down to them; and so haply they will reflect." However, the problem with this interpretation is that it conflicts with the Prophet's own Hadiths and other Noble Verses regarding the Thikr. Allah Almighty in Noble Verses in question (16:43-44) first talked about Moses' Thikr, then David's Psalms, and then Muhammad's Thikr. It seems quite clear that the last part of Noble Verse 16:44 is speaking about the Prophet personally explaining and demonstrating the Noble Quran (Muhammad's Thikr) that was sent down to him, to the "People of the Book" (Jews and Christians) and to the pagans. This is clearly proven in the fact that there EXISTS NOT A SINGLE Hadith from among the 100s of thousands out there that says that the Prophet's personal sayings are Thikr/Dhikr!
Further proofs that the Prophet's words weren't Dhikr:
1- Also, if all the Prophet spoke was Divine Revelations (Quran and Thikr), then why did he make mistakes and was even warned about them by Allah Almighty in the Noble Quran? Please visit: Would a Muslim really become an infidel if he says that Prophet Muhammad made mistakes before?
2- If Prophet Muhammad truly spoke nothing but Divine Revelations, then Allah Almighty would not have Said the following:
"It is part of the Mercy of Allah that thou dost deal gently with them. Wert thou severe or harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from about thee: so pass over (their faults), and ask for (Allah's) forgiveness for them; and consult them in affairs (of moment). Then, when thou hast taken a decision, put thy trust in Allah. For Allah loves those who put their trust (in Him). (The Noble Quran, 3:159)"
And consult with them?? If all the Prophet spoke were Divine Revelations, then would Allah Almighty need the Prophet to consult with anyone?? The obvious answer is No. Neither does Allah Almighty consult with anyone, nor were the Prophet's words all Divine Revelations because he was commanded by Allah Almighty to consult with others.
The Woe and Curse of GOD Almighty on the liars and blasphemers!
Not only that, but Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran:
"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book (i.e., the Bible), but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-78)"
What the blasphemous salafies did was invent the lie about Prophet Muhammad's Sayings (Hadiths) being the Thikr (also spelled as Dhikr), while the Prophet himself never made that claim. Allah Almighty clearly warned the Muslims about writing man-made lies and attributing them to Him, the Almighty. Recall the dajjal's stupidity above about him and his cult believing in the 600,000 narrations? Now you see where I am going! The Muslims have a great dispute among each others on which hadith is true and which is a false lie and gossip that was put on the mouth of Prophet Muhammad! And with the blasphemous infidels claiming that the Prophet's Sayings are Dhikr, and with them now using the Noble Quran (15:9) to back up their lies, one will immediately find himself going down clashing with them on not just a personal opinion about this hadith or that, but rather on the belief in GOD Almighty's Words!
So in other words, when one for some reason or another rejects to accept a certain hadith and declares it to be a fairy tale or gossip, he will easily and immediately be charged with blasphemy by the blasphemous cultists, because he now according to them is rejecting a Verse from Allah Almighty's Dhikr! Yet like I said:
Not a single Hadith says that the Hadiths are Dhikr!
| The sub-sections here are:
(a)- The Prophet's Commands.
(a)- The Prophet's Commands: And yes, the Prophet's Commands are a must-to-follow according to the Noble Quran, but they're still not Divine Revelations from Allah Almighty! Otherwise, the Prophet would've clearly said so! There are ample Noble Verses in the Noble Quran that Command the Muslims to follow not only the Noble Quran, but also the Commands of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. However, this doesn't mean that we must believe in the 100s of thousands of gossips out there, nor would it a crime if we disagree on the Hadiths. The Noble Quran already has all of the Islamic Five Pillars and Moral Codes covered anyway. The only thing that the Hadiths have which the Noble Quran doesn't have is that they give elaborations on the Islamic Rituals such as how to Pray; how to Fast; how to perform Pilgrimage, and so on, and these Hadiths are not disputed about among Muslims anyway!! So there is really nothing left outside the Noble Quran to follow! That is why the Hadiths are not Dhikr, nor did Allah Almighty Say they are, nor is there a single Hadith that says they are either. Anyway, here is what Allah Almighty Said regarding the Prophet's commands: "O ye who believe! Obey God, and obey the Apostle, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to God and His Apostle, if ye do believe in God and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination. (The Noble Quran, 4:59)" "When there comes to them some matter touching (Public) safety or fear, they divulge it. If they had only referred it to the Apostle, or to those charged with authority among them, the proper investigators would have Tested it from them (direct). Were it not for the Grace and Mercy of God unto you, all but a few of you would have fallen into the clutches of Satan. (The Noble Quran, 4:83)" Here not only the Prophet's commands are a must-to-follow, but also the religious leaders in case there is a situation where the Noble Quran and Hadiths don't cover!
So now does this make the Islamic Judge's words Dhikr too?
"God did confer a great favour on the believers when He sent among them an apostle from among themselves, rehearsing unto them the Signs of God, sanctifying them, and instructing them in Scripture and Wisdom, while, before that, they had been in manifest error. (The Noble Quran, 3:164)" "Obey God, and obey the Apostle, and beware (of evil): if ye do turn back, know ye that it is Our Apostle's duty to proclaim (the message) in the clearest manner. (The Noble Quran, 5:92)" "(We sent) clear proofs and the scriptures. Now, We have sent you this reminder (Qur’an) so that you may demonstrate the revelations to them. Perhaps they may reflect and ponder! (The Noble Quran, 16:44)" "Those who follow the apostle, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures),- in the law and the Gospel;- for he commands them what is just and forbids them what is evil; he allows them as lawful what is good (and pure) and prohibits them from what is bad (and impure); He releases them from their heavy burdens and from the yokes that are upon them. So it is those who believe in him, honour him, help him, and follow the light which is sent down with him,- it is they who will prosper. (The Noble Quran, 7:157)" "Say: "Obey God, and obey the Apostle: but if ye turn away, he is only responsible for the duty placed on him and ye for that placed on you. If ye obey him, ye shall be on right guidance. The Apostle's duty is only to preach the clear (Message). (The Noble Quran, 24:54)""So establish regular Prayer and give regular Charity; and obey the Apostle; that ye may receive mercy. (The Noble Quran, 24:56)""Ye have indeed in the Apostle of God a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in God and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of God. (The Noble Quran, 33:21)""It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by God and His Apostle to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys God and His Apostle, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path. (The Noble Quran, 33:36)""The Day that their faces will be turned upside down in the Fire, they will say: "Woe to us! Would that we had obeyed God and obeyed the Apostle!" (The Noble Quran, 33:66)""It is He Who has sent amongst the Unlettered an apostle from among themselves, to rehearse to them His Signs, to sanctify them, and to instruct them in Scripture and Wisdom,- although they had been, before, in manifest error;- (The Noble Quran, 62:2)""So obey God, and obey His Apostle: but if ye turn back, the duty of Our Apostle is but to proclaim (the Message) clearly and openly. (The Noble Quran, 64:12)"Most of these Noble Verses were taken from Combat Kit To Use Against the "Quran Only" Muslims.
Again, not a single
Hadith says that the
Hadiths are Dhikr!
(b)- What about the Inspirations (wahi) that came to the Prophet? Many of the Hadiths of the Prophet, peace be upon him, were inspirations from the Angels. But Angels' inspirations also come upon the believers: "Raised high above ranks (or degrees), (He is) the Lord of the Throne (of Authority): by His Command doth He send the Spirit (of inspiration) to any of His servants he pleases, that it may warn (men) of the Day of Mutual Meeting,- (The Noble Quran, 40:15)" Beside, it is only natural for the Prophet to have wahi. This doesn't mean anything. It doesn't make his words Divine Quran, especially when the Prophet himself made mistakes before and he was even warned about them by Allah Almighty in the Noble Quran: Would a Muslim really become an infidel if he says that Prophet Muhammad made mistakes before?
So did Allah Almighty make those mistakes, and did He warn Himself?
Only the absurd fools would believe this. |
And also, please visit: Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace, and which do I condemn? This is a very important article that will clear a lot of their smoke screens and lies.
As to the Law of Moses (Dhikr of Moses), I have proven this with irrefutable evidence at: http://www.answering-islam.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm.
Also, this article contains all of GOD Almighty's Holy Commands to Prophet Moses and his brother Aaron, peace be upon them, in the Jewish Law: http://www.answering-christianity.com/the_mosaic_law_xxx.htm. This is only a rough draft. The complete article is coming up insha'Allah.
As to the incident - that this barking salafi will keep endlessly bringing up over and over again throughout his article - it is as follows:
From http://www.answering-islam.com/jalal_went_crazy.htm:
The tale of the hate:
Back in the 1700s (many years ago that is), once upon a time I thought about embracing the Quran-only belief, where I would only believe in the Noble Quran and reject every other scripture - mainly the Hadiths. During those long-gone days, I once read a Hadith by the Prophet, peace be upon him, about where the sun goes after sunset. Unfortunately for me (or fortunately depending on how you see it today since I am colliding with the wahabi liars), I misread the Hadith and thought that the Prophet said that the sun goes UNDER THE EARTH. I then said that the Prophet spoke "utter nonsense", and I raised a doubt about the accuracy of his interpretations of the Noble Verses that dealt with science in the Noble Quran. It then turned out that the Prophet of Islam never said that and I was wrong! I wrote a big article demonstrating that Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was actually in harmony with science today:
Please visit: Does the Hadith really contain scientific errors regarding the sun's rising and setting?
And also visit: Did the Noble Quran really say that the sun sets and rises on Murky Spring on earth?
I already repented many times in the past (and the dajjal knows this very well) and I repent again!! I repent that I said this about the Holy Prophet of Islam, peace be upon him. I was wrong and I was naive. May Allah Almighty forgive me. Ameen. I also - as I made this very clear on my site - no longer embrace the Quran-only deviant belief. The Authentic Prophetic Sunnah is a must-to-follow upon every believer according to the Noble Quran Itself.
Please visit: Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace, and which do I condemn?
That's it!!
That's all that this liar and dajjal has on me; old news!!
To the fair and ordinary reader, this should suffice. But not to this Jalal Abualrub wahabi and takfiri dajjal and coward. Osama Abdallah is an infidel regardless of whether he repents or not, because Osama is anti-salafis i.e., anti-liars. This low in standards and integrity dajjal has written ample articles all circling around the two points that I mentioned above, and each article with new twist and decorated lie. What is most ironic about all of his writings is that he would make a new vague and outrageously ridiculous claim about me such as "Osama is even more hateful to the Prophet than Sam Shamoun" and use other links of his as references. In other words, he is using lies to support new lies as he slowly builds his false case and lies against me.
See also our detailed and thorough rebuttals to all of his lies and nonsense at:
Jalal Abul-Rub's (the dajjal) section.
His hypocrisy, backbiting and cowardice are all exposed here. Everyone is an
infidel to this dajjal.
Let us now look at his FOUL EMAIL. In a reaction to a recent online petition that was created against him, here is what this dajjal barked to me via email.....
Continued at: http://www.answering-islam.com/jalal_went_crazy.htm.
He wrote:
Next, Osama brings ‘evidence’ to Prophet Muhammadʹs overstepping his limits, since to him, the Prophet…thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt. This is the problem when one wants to think that he is being inspired when he…has good inner feelings. Apparently, Prophet Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam, did not know that the Quran was actually revealed for Osama Abdallah to explain, not for him, Muhammad Ibn Abdullah, to explain even though it is he, Muhammad, whom Allah chose from all of mankind to receive the Quran and its Bayan, {O, Prophet (Muhammad)! Verily, We have sent you as a Shahidan (witness), wa- Mubash-shiran (and a bearer of glad tidings), wa-Nadhira (and a Warner). And as one who invites to Allâh [Islâmic Monotheism, i.e. to worship none but Allâh (Alone)] by His Leave, and as a Sirajan Munira (lamp spreading light, i.e. through your instructions from the Qur’ân and the Sunnah)}; [33:45-47].
Take for instance our Prophetʹs thoughts on the shape of the earth and its role in the solar system. He thought that the earth was stable…like the Bible claims and the sun and the moon swim circularly around it: Narrated Abu Dhar: The Prophet asked me at sunset, ʹDo you know where the sun goes (at the time of sunset)?ʹ I replied, ʹAllah and His Apostle know better.ʹ He said, ʹIt goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates Itself underneath the Throne and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted and then (a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go on its course but it will not be permitted, but it will be ordered to return whence it has come and so it will rise in the west. And that is the interpretation of the Statement of Allah: ʹAnd the sun Runs its fixed course For a term (decreed). that is The Decree of (Allah) The Exalted in Might, The All-Knowing.ʹ (36.38) (Translation of Sahih Bukhari…Volume 4, Book 54, Number 421) The sun DOES NOT GO underneath the earth. It is the earth that goes around the sun while rotating around its own axle! The Prophetʹs interpretation of Noble Verse 36:38 was UTTER NONSENSE AND WRONG!Comments: Osama forgot a few ‘minor’ details here. First, there is no mention of the Ardh (earth) in this Hadeeth or even the solar system; there is mention of the `Arsh (Allah’s Throne), about which Allah said this, {The Most Gracious (Allâh) Istawâ (rose) over the (Mighty) Arsh (His Throne, in a manner that suits His Majesty)}; [20:5]. Thus, Osama lied and attributed his lie to the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, who clearly stated that the sun prostrates underneath the Throne, not ‘underneath the earth’ as Osama falsely claimed. Second, where did the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, think that the earth was stable? This is another lie invented by Osama on account of which he humiliated the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, with his rude remarks even though it is nowhere to be found in the Prophet’s Hadeeth, which is about where the sun goes. Third, the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, was describing a matter of the Unseen, Allah’s Throne, which mankind cannot see in this life. Hopefully, Osama believes in Ayah 20:5. If he does, and if he believes that the Arsh is a matter of the Unseen, then how can Osama deny that the sun goes underneath an object that cannot be seen by mankind? If Osama believes that Allah’s Arsh can be seen in this life by mankind, he is requested to point to its direction so that mankind witnesses how Muhammad got carried away by explaining an Ayah that was not really meant for him to explain, as Osama claimed. If Osama does not believe in Ayah 20:5, then, this is what Allah said about the believers, {This is the Book (the Qur’ân), whereof there is no doubt,a guidance to those who are Al-Muttaqűn (the pious). Who believe in the Ghaib (the Unseen)}; [2:2-3]. Fourth, it seems that Osama believes that the sun is ‘stable’ (he means ‘stationary’; if the earth was unstable, we would not be here refuting his nonsense). Here are Osama’s thoughts about whom he calls ‘our Prophet’: He thought that the earth was stable…like the Bible claims and the sun and the moon swim circularly around it…The sun DOES NOT GO underneath the earth. It is the earth that goes around the sun while rotating around its own axle. Thus, Osama rejects the idea that the earth is stable, which is a lie he falsely attributed to the Prophet, by affirming that it is the earth that goes around the sun. It is an established scientific fact that the sun is not stationary. Rather, the entire universe is ever expanding (http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-236199) just as Allah stated in the Quran, {With Hands did We construct the heaven, wa-inna la-musi`un (Verily, We are Able [or We shall] extend the vastness of space thereof)}; [51:47].
My response:
Again, same barks over one lousy point that I have thoroughly corrected and proven that the Prophet of Islam, peace be upon him, was in harmony with science over:
Does the Hadith really contain scientific errors regarding the sun's rising and setting?
Did the Noble Quran really say that the sun sets and rises on Murky Spring on earth?
Not only that, but I did repent countless times in the past and the foul-mouthed salafi and deceiver knows this very well.
|
Jalal
Abualrub went crazy! See his FOUL LANGUAGE and fatwa (verdict)
for me to be killed! |
Emails
from Salafies who despise Jalal Abualrub.
Sex with animals: Are Jalal Abualrub and Nadir Ahmed (N/A) really mentally stable persons? See how Nadir Ahmed falsely and unjustly propagates that Islam allows sex with animals on his irrelevant web site, and how Jalal Abualrub (the dajjal) keeps promoting NA's site on his web site despite the fact that he knows about this article and the Truth about Nadir.
Jalal Abualrub's scholarly advise to Nadir Ahmed to VIDEO TAPE his fight with me!
He wrote:
Next, Osama brings other evidence to errors in the Sunnah, as he sees them. In this example, Osama insinuates that Prophet Muhammad, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, did not only think that he is being inspired when he [only had] good inner feelings, but he also contradicted the same Quran which Allah sent down to him to convey to mankind both its letter and its Bayan.
What is the punishment for a married personʹs adultery…? Hadiths: ʹUbada b. as-Samit reported…Allahʹs Messenger…as saying: Receive (teaching) from me, receive (teaching) from me. Allah has ordained a way for those (women). When an unmarried male commits adultery with an unmarried female (they should receive) one hundred lashes and banishment for one year. And in case of married male committing adultery with a married female, they shall receive one hundred lashes and be stoned to death. (Translation of Sahih Muslim…)ʺ…Bible: Leviticus 20:10 ʺIf a man commits adultery with another manʹs wife…both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.ʺ…Noble Quran: ʺThe woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, flog each of them with a hundred stripes…(The Noble Quran, 24:2)ʺ…Yet, we donʹt know if the Noble Quran came to nullify the Jewish Law or not! Narrated Ash-Shaibani: ʺI asked ʹAbdullah bin Abi ʹAufa about the Rajam (stoning to death…). He replied, ʹThe Prophet carried out the penalty of Rajam…’I asked, ʹWas that before or after the revelation of Surat-an-Nur? (…24:2)ʹ He replied, ʹI do not know.ʹ (Translation of Sahih Bukhari…).ʺ So according to Hadith #824, Noble Verse 24:2 quite possibly came to abrogate the Jewish Law regarding stoning to death the adulterer and/or adulteress, and to only limit the punishment to 100 lashes for both single and married.
Osama’s aim is to reject the Prophet’s role as the conveyer of both the Quran’s letter and its explanation in addition to being the legislator for Muslims on behalf of Allah. Osama seems to accept Muhammad’s role as a legislator in the Islamic areas of Osama’s choice, since he says, ‘I only accept the hadiths that have a direct relationship to the Noble Quran, such as explaining how to Pray, fast, etc’. But, he again confuses the issues because he aims to insert his own ludicrous understanding of the Quran even if the price is to, in effect, call the Prophet, peace be upon him, a liar! Here is the proof.
First, Osama asks, ‘What is the punishment for a married personʹs adultery?’ He then mentions a Hadeeth which reports the Prophet’s decree regarding punishment for the adulterer: stoning to death (‘Rajm’, not, ‘Rajam’). Yet, Osama says this afterward, ‘We donʹt know if the Quran came to nullify the Jewish Law or not’, thus, insinuating that stoning the adulterer remained a part of the Jewish law even after the Prophet, sallallahu `alaihi wa-sallam, conveyed that it is Allah Who has made this the Law, which the Prophet implemented by stoning Muslim adulterers to death. Second, hopefully, when Osama said that ‘We (actually, he) donʹt know if the Quran came to nullify the Jewish Law, he meant with regards to Rajm. Otherwise, it would be astounding for Osama to entertain the idea that Islam did not abrogate some of the Jewish law, especially since it is Osama who rejects Rajm, which is a part of what he calls ‘Jewish law’, and since Allah says this about His Prophet, {Those who follow the Messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write (Muhammad) whom they find written with them in the Taurât (Torah) (Deut, xviii 15) and the Injeel (Gospel) (John, xiv 16), — he commands them for Al-Ma‘rűf (all that Islâm has ordained); and forbids them from Al- Munkar (all that Islâm has forbidden); he allows them as lawful At-Tayyibât (all things good and lawful), and prohibits them as unlawful Al-Khabâ’ith (all things evil and unlawful), he releases them from their heavy burdens (of Allâh’s Covenant with the children of Israel), and from the fetters (bindings) that were upon them}; [7:157]. Also, Osama should have said that he does not know if the Quran came to nullify the Jewish law. This is because ‘we, the Muslims’ believe that, unlike the numerous laws that Allah ordained for the Children of Israel that were abrogated in Islam, Islam upheld the law of Rajm: the very Hadeeth Osama quoted answers the very question he posted about the punishment of the adulterer in Islam. Third, Osama hid from his readers a crucial part of the Hadeeth he quoted, because it does not agree with his aim to discredit Muhammad’s role as the explainer of the Quran and as a legislator on behalf of Allah. Here is the full text of the Hadeeth that Osama reported; it is found in Sahih Muslim (3200). ʹUbadah Ibn as-Samit reported that whenever Allahʹs Messenger, sallallahu `alaihi wa-sallam, received revelation, he felt its rigor and the complexion of his face changed. One day revelation descended upon him, he felt the same rigor. When it was over and he felt relief, he said, “Take from me. Verily Allah has ordained a way for them (women who commit Zina): (When) a married man (commits adultery) with a married woman, and an unmarried male with an unmarried woman, then in case of married (persons) there is (a punishment) of one hundred lashes and then stoning (to death). And in case of unmarried persons, (the punishment) is one hundred lashes and exile for one year.” What happened to the part of the Hadeeth that states that one day, revelation descended upon the Prophet of Allah, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, who then said the Hadeeth that `Ubadah quoted? Also missing a comment from Osama is the part of the Hadeeth stating that the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, said, “Allah has ordained a way.” Thus, how can Osama claim that he is not a rejecter of Hadeeth, when he does not submit to the Prophet’s decision about the Rajm, even though the Prophet stated that, Allah has ordained a way? Has the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, lied about this being a commandment from Allah? Apparently, Osama thinks so. He had before described the Prophet as having ‘spoken utter nonsense when he thought that he was inspired to say what he said when in reality he wasnʹt.’
My response:
First of all, I no longer believe that only the Hadiths that are linked to the Noble Quran are the only valid ones. I have covered this in great details at:
Which Islamic beliefs do I embrace and which do I condemn
As to adultery, I have exposed this liar's twisting of my quotes and points at:
Refuting Jalal Abul-Rub's fabrication of quotes and lies. Despite everyone's warning to him to not fabricate lies against me, he still insisted on doing it. See for yourself the email-conversations that took place. He also never answered any of my challenges that I raised to him. All he did was go in circles around my points and never directly answered any of them. He also wouldn't publicly admit that he flat-out rejects:
Yet, he calls me an apostate and an infidel. You be the judge between me and this clown!
Jalal is in the wrong for calling Osama a Kafir (infidel) and Murtad (apostate).
Further exposing Jalal Abul-Rub and responding to his "open challenge".
Responding to Jalal Abul-Rub's challenge to me on the Hadiths.
Here is why the Noble Quran abrogates the Hadiths and the Mosaic Law:
| The Hadiths and the Law
are on the same level: Allah Almighty clearly declared in the Noble Quran that if we have any question about the Laws of GOD Almighty, then ASK THE PEOPLE OF THIKR (10:94) if we know not. Those people are the People of the Law of Moses (Kitab Musa as mentioned in the Noble Quran). See http://www.answering-christianity.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm. So what this means is that if I am confronted with a topic such as bestiality, then I can certainly ask or consult with the People of Thikr about what Allah Almighty Said regarding it. Now while the punishment may not necessarily be applied in Islam, but the prohibition still stands. So while the Mosaic Law says to kill those who practice bestiality, and in particular to kill any woman who just approaches an animal to have sex with it - kill her before she even does the act (Leviticus 20:15-16), in Islam we don't necessarily have to apply such Law. But like I said, the prohibition certainly stands. But anyway, we Also do have Hadiths today that command the killing of those who practice bestiality. So While the Hadiths (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) and the Law of
Moses aren't the original words of Prophet Muhammad, and GOD
Almighty in Prophet Moses' (peace be upon him) Books respectively,
because they had been narrated and renarrated by men, but they are still
close enough to the Truth. So while a Hadith (any Hadith) may not be
the very absolute exact words that the Prophet of Islam spoke, but
nonetheless, it is close enough to reveal his original command, thus making
the preservation of the original text irrelevant. The same applies to the
Law of Moses. However, this does bring the command in the Hadiths and the
Law of Moses below the Noble Quran because only the Noble Quran is Divine
and perfectly preserved. That is why Allah Almighty Said in the Noble Quran
(5:48)
that the Quran is Muhaymin
(dominant or rules over) over all of the other Books. If we carefully examine
this Noble Word, Muhaymin, then we'll clearly see that my conclusion is
valid - that the Noble Quran abrogates and overrides everything else because
it is a Book that is Muhaymin (rules over and above all other books):
Arabic (from right to left):
5:48
وانزلنا اليك الكتاب بالحق مصدقا لما بين يديه من الكتاب
ومهيمنا عليه فاحكم بينهم
بما انزل الله ولاتتبع اهواءهم عما جاءك من الحق لكل جعلنا
منكم شرعة ومنهاجا ولو شاء الله لجعلكم امة واحدة ولكن ليبلوكم
فيما اتاكم فاستبقوا الخيرات الى الله مرجعكم جميعا فينبئكم
بما كنتم فيه تختلفون
Muhammad Al-Hilali & Muhsin Khan:
"And We have sent down to you (O
Muhammad SAW) the Book (this Quran) in truth, confirming the
Scripture that came before it and
Mohayminan (trustworthy in highness
and a witness) over it (old Scriptures).
So judge between them by what Allah has revealed, and follow
not their vain desires, diverging away from the truth that
has come to you. To each among you, We have prescribed a law
and a clear way. If Allah willed, He would have made you one
nation, but that (He) may test you in what He has given you;
so strive as in a race in good deeds. The return of you
(all) is to Allah; then He will inform you about that in
which you used to differ.
(The Noble Quran, 5:48)"
"We had surely granted Musa the guidance,
and We made the Israelites inherit the book,
(The Noble Quran, 40:53)"
So this means that the actual Divine Laws of GOD Almighty are preserved in the Mosaic Law, even if the text of the verses isn't original. The same rule applies to Islam's Hadiths. |
He wrote:
Fourth, by inserting what the Bible says about stoning the adulterer to death, Osama might in fact be insinuating that the Prophet got the idea from the Bible!
My response:
The foul-mouthed salafi doesn't know that the Bible does contain Divine Revelations in it, especially among the Commands that GOD Almighty sent to Prophet Moses, peace be upon him, where He directly commands him "This is what the LORD Says...." I have proven this with irrefutable evidence at: http://www.answering-islam.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm.
Also, this article contains all of GOD Almighty's Holy Commands to Prophet Moses and his brother Aaron, peace be upon them, in the Jewish Law: http://www.answering-christianity.com/the_mosaic_law_xxx.htm. This is only a rough draft. The complete article is coming up insha'Allah.
So Prophet Muhammad getting something from the Jewish Law that was sent down to Prophet Moses and his brother Aaron doesn't mean anything bad since it is after all from GOD Almighty. Not only that, but Allah Almighty clearly declared the following:
1- From http://www.answering-islam.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm
The "Book" الكتاب (al-kitab) is the book that was sent to Moses:
"We did aforetime give Moses the (Book of) Guidance, and We gave the book in inheritance to the Children of Israel,- (The Noble Quran, 40:53)"40:53 ولقد اتينا موسى الهدى واورثنا بني اسرائيل الكتاب
"Can they be (like) those who accept a Clear (Sign) from their Lord, and whom a witness from Himself doth teach, as did the Book of Moses كتاب موسى before it,- a guide and a mercy? They believe therein; but those of the Sects that reject it,- the Fire will be their promised meeting-place. Be not then in doubt thereon: for it is the truth from thy Lord: yet many among men do not believe! (The Noble Quran, 11:17)"
"And before this, was the Book of Moses كتاب موسى as a guide and a mercy: And this Book confirms (it) in the Arabic tongue; to admonish the unjust, and as Glad Tidings to those who do right. (The Noble Quran, 46:12)"
The Jews inherited the Law, not the corrupt Bible!
2- From http://www.answering-islam.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm
| Noble Verse(s) 10:94-10:95 |
| Arabic
(from right to left):
10:94 فان كنت في شك مما انزلنا اليك فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب من قبلك لقد جاءك الحق من ربك فلا تكونن من الممترين 10:95 ولاتكونن من الذين كذبوا بايات الله فتكون من الخاسرينMuhammad Al-Hilali & Muhsin Khan: [010:094] So if you are in doubt concerning that which We have revealed unto you, then ask those who are reading the Book before you. Verily, the truth has come to you from your Lord. So be not of those who doubt (it).[010:095] And be not one of those who belie the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allah, for then you shall be one of the losers. |
To the reader, please visit the link because I
provided far more evidence from the Noble Quran regarding the Law of Moses.
He wrote:
Further, Osama’s question was about Islam’s punishment for the adulterer, so what is the purpose of mentioning what the Bible decrees about it? What if the Bible did not even mention this law, will this change the fact that the Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam, said that stoning is the way that Allah has ordained, as well as, the testimony of the witness who reported the Hadeeth, Ubadah, that this was a revelation?
My response:
No foul-mouthed dajjal, but it certainly shows that Allah Almighty abrogated the Law of stoning to death through the Noble Quran.
Again, here is why the Noble Quran abrogates the Hadiths and the Mosaic Law:
| The Hadiths and the Law
are on the same level: Allah Almighty clearly declared in the Noble Quran that if we have any question about the Laws of GOD Almighty, then ASK THE PEOPLE OF THIKR (10:94) if we know not. Those people are the People of the Law of Moses (Kitab Musa as mentioned in the Noble Quran). See http://www.answering-christianity.com/Deuteronomy4_2.htm. So what this means is that if I am confronted with a topic such as bestiality, then I can certainly ask or consult with the People of Thikr about what Allah Almighty Said regarding it. Now while the punishment may not necessarily be applied in Islam, but the prohibition still stands. So while the Mosaic Law says to kill those who practice bestiality, and in particular to kill any woman who just approaches an animal to have sex with it - kill her before she even does the act (Leviticus 20:15-16), in Islam we don't necessarily have to apply such Law. But like I said, the prohibition certainly stands. But anyway, we Also do have Hadiths today that command the killing of those who practice bestiality. So While the Hadiths (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) and the Law of
Moses aren't the original words of Prophet Muhammad, and GOD
Almighty in Prophet Moses' (peace be upon him) Books respectively,
because they had been narrated and renarrated by men, but they are still
close enough to the Truth. So while a Hadith (any Hadith) may not be
the very absolute exact words that the Prophet of Islam spoke, but
nonetheless, it is close enough to reveal his original command, thus making
the preservation of the original text irrelevant. The same applies to the
Law of Moses. However, this does bring the command in the Hadiths and the
Law of Moses below the Noble Quran because only the Noble Quran is Divine
and perfectly preserved. That is why Allah Almighty Said in the Noble Quran
(5:48)
that the Quran is Muhaymin
(dominant or rules over) over all of the other Books. If we carefully examine
this Noble Word, Muhaymin, then we'll clearly see that my conclusion is
valid - that the Noble Quran abrogates and overrides everything else because
it is a Book that is Muhaymin (rules over and above all other books):
Arabic (from right to left):
5:48
وانزلنا اليك الكتاب بالحق مصدقا لما بين يديه من الكتاب
ومهيمنا عليه فاحكم بينهم
بما انزل الله ولاتتبع اهواءهم عما جاءك من الحق لكل جعلنا
منكم شرعة ومنهاجا ولو شاء الله لجعلكم امة واحدة ولكن ليبلوكم
فيما اتاكم فاستبقوا الخيرات الى الله مرجعكم جميعا فينبئكم
بما كنتم فيه تختلفون
Muhammad Al-Hilali & Muhsin Khan:
"And We have sent down to you (O
Muhammad SAW) the Book (this Quran) in truth, confirming the
Scripture that came before it and
Mohayminan (trustworthy in highness
and a witness) over it (old Scriptures).
So judge between them by what Allah has revealed, and follow
not their vain desires, diverging away from the truth that
has come to you. To each among you, We have prescribed a law
and a clear way. If Allah willed, He would have made you one
nation, but that (He) may test you in what He has given you;
so strive as in a race in good deeds. The return of you
(all) is to Allah; then He will inform you about that in
which you used to differ.
(The Noble Quran, 5:48)"
"We had surely granted Musa the guidance,
and We made the Israelites inherit the book,
(The Noble Quran, 40:53)"
So this means that the actual Divine Laws of GOD Almighty are preserved in the Mosaic Law, even if the text of the verses isn't original. The same rule applies to Islam's Hadiths. |
He wrote:
Fifth, the Prophet of Allah, who was sent by Allah to explain the Quran, {And We have not sent down the Book (the Qur’ân) to you (O, Muhammad), except li-Tubayyina (that you may explain clearly) unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe}; [16:64], has in fact answered Osama’s question in the clearest of terms. Muslim (3212) narrated that al-Bara` Ibn `Azib said, “A Jew blackened and lashed happened to pass by Allah’s Messenger, salla-llahu `alaihi wasallam. Allahʹs Messenger, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, called them (the Jews) and said, ‘Is this the punishment that you find in your Book (Torah) as a prescribed punishment for adultery?’ They said, ‘Yes.’ The Prophet, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, called one of the scholars amongst them and said, ‘I ask you in the name of Allah Who sent down the Torah on Moses if that is the prescribed punishment for adultery that you find in your Book?’ He said, ‘No. Had you not asked me in the name of Allah, I would not have given you this information. We find stoning to death (as punishment prescribed in the Torah). But this (crime) became quite common amongst our aristocratic class. Thus, when we caught any rich person (committing this offence) we spared him, but when we caught a helpless person we imposed the prescribed punishment on him. We then said, ‘Let us agree (on a punishment) which we can inflict both upon the rich and the poor.’ Consequently, we decided to blacken the face with coal and flog as a substitute punishment for stoning.’ Allahʹs Messenger, salla-llahu `alaihi wa-sallam, said: ‘O, Allah! I am the first to revive Your Command after